← Data Centers

Policies: What Refusal Looks Like

The playbook is the same everywhere a data center gets sited: court elected leaders directly, require an NDA before anyone else sees the terms, and move fast enough that a public vote never quite happens before the deal is signed. It’s happening on tribal land — and in small towns, counties, and countries far outside Indian Country too. Here’s what some communities have actually done about it.

Adopted moratoria and bans

Seminole Nation of Oklahoma — General Council, 24–0, March 7, 2026

Moratorium on “the advancement of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology and hyperscale data center development within the Seminole Nation and within tribal lands and territories.” Native News Online →

Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians — Board of Directors, unanimous, April 7, 2026

Resolution “establishing a moratorium prohibiting the development, approval, or operation of artificial intelligence (AI) data centers on Tribal lands,” in effect indefinitely until repealed. The Sault News →

Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians — Tribal Council (Dinilawigi), 11–0, May 7, 2026

Indefinite moratorium on building, constructing, or maintaining data centers within the 57,000-acre Qualla Boundary; sponsors called the facilities a “clear and present danger” to water, land, and community. The Cherokee One Feather →

In progress

Cherokee Nation — task force, established February 2026

Studying environmental and economic impact on the Cherokee Nation Reservation. Cherokee Phoenix →

Muscogee Nation — task force, established July 2026

Rejected a data center bid in late 2025 after grassroots opposition; created a Tribal Digital Infrastructure and Data Sovereignty Task Force to examine AI and data centers going forward. KGOU →

Caddo Nation — evaluating, 2026

No formal policy yet; leadership says there is “absolutely no consideration — categorically — no consideration for a hyperscale data center by the nation” at this time. Tulsa Flyer →

Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma — Business Committee statement, July 2026

Opposition statement, not a formal ban: data centers are “not compatible with its long-term vision for sustainable development and responsible stewardship of Tribal resources.” KOSU →

Conditional approval

Some jurisdictions allow data centers only under strict conditions — independent environmental review, no community-facing NDAs, employment and revenue-sharing requirements, water caps, binding exit terms. No adopted tribal example yet — send us one.

← Back to Indigenous AI Commons